Scott on Writing

Musings on technical writing...

Tim O'Reilly on the State of the Computer Book Market

As I wrote in a previous blog entry, you don't write computer trade books to become rich.  In today's soft technical book market, there's a good chance that you'll not receive one penny of your royalty, instead just receiving whatever advance monies you agree upon with your publisher.  This, at least, is the state for writing computer trade books geared toward ASP/ASP.NET developers.  One thing that I've always wondered about, though, is how other types of books fare in the market.  In absolute terms, as well as in royalty dollars, how does an ASP.NET book compare to one of those “Office 2003 for Dummies“-type books?  Another question that had been on my mind was how ASP.NET books sold compared to PHP books, or JSP books.  My initial assumption would be that there was a strong correlation between market share and book sales.  That is, if there were twice as many Web developers working on PHP than JSP, a PHP-focused book would sell, roughly, twice as many copies as a comparable JSP book.

Some of these questions on sales numbers were answered for me when I stumbled across Tim O'Reilly's State of the Computer Book Market blog entry.  Tim's entry, unfortunately, does not discuss why the technical book market is so soft, it merely takes a gander at some of the recent statistics from Nielsen BookScan.  These statistics help answer some of the questions I addressed in the preceding paragraph. 

First, Tim shows a graph (replicated below) of book sales by month, broken down into the various technical book genres.

This graph shows what I had assumed: application-focused books significantly outperform those books written for developers.  This makes sense, as there are many more secretaries needing to learn the ins and outs of Word and Excel than there are developers needing to learn the latest programming language du jour.  Too, Platform books are outselling software development books.  I assume these are end users wanting to learn more about Windows XP, or Mac OSX.  What's depressing is that software development books are virtually dead last.  Yes, they're a smidgen above the Networking Admin books, but the only real distance it has above other categories of books are Unknown and Other.  While it's great not to be in last place, it's a bit disheartening to say, “Well, at least we're better than Unknown and Other.”

The end of the year NetScan results for 2002 and 2003 show what all of us authors knew from our royalty statements: the technical book market shrank by nearly 11% from 2002 to 2003.  While Tim doesn't share statistics pre-dating 2002, trust me - it has shrunk even more leading up to 2002.

Tim's entry shares one more interesting graph (shown below), which shows how books by platform fare.  Notice that even though Windows boasts a 90%+ marketshare, only slightly more than half the books are targetted toward Windows developers or end users.

Tim notes this greater level of enthusiasm from Mac/Linux users than from Windows users, but does not venture a guess as to why Mac and Linux books sell a disproportionate number of books compared to their installed-base marketshare.  Personally, I think the reason is that Windows users are less focused, on average, than Mac or Linux users.  Now, I am not slighting Windows users by calling them unfocused.  To see what I mean, consider the following: imagine you have a friend who says she wants a computer.  You ask her what she plans do use it for.  She says, “I dunno, surfing the Web, checking email.  Games, maybe.”  There are a lot of end users who buy a computer with no real point in mind.  Maybe they get it because everyone else on the block has one, or because their kids keep bugging them to get one.  The point is, what type of computer is this person going to get?  One from Dell or Gateway or from Bust Buy or CompUSA.  One that will come with Windows.  They'll likely not fork over the dough for a Mac, and there's no way they'll have the know-how or patience to use Linux.  So they end up with a Windows box.

Now, someone who did not get the computer to perform a focused task, what do they need a computer book for?  They can figure out how to get online, how to chat with IM, and how to install and play a game they bought.  These users aren't doing focused tasks that require an in-depth look at a particular topic.  Hence, no sale here.  Mac and Linux users are likely more focused.  They got their computer for some very specific reason, and need to learn some very specific task very well.  They won't balk at dropping $30 for a book to help them master whatever it is they are needing to accomplish.

posted on Monday, April 19, 2004 2:36 PM

Feedback

# re: Tim O'Reilly on the State of the Computer Book Market 4/19/2004 7:19 PM Matt

I think the extensive nature of MSDN makes Windows developers less likely to hunt down external docs. You can bitch about undocumented features, but anthing that is documented is documented well.

# re: Tim O'Reilly on the State of the Computer Book Market 4/20/2004 7:26 AM Brian R. James

<< don't write computer trade books to become rich >>. While I don't doubt the fact that authoring these books may itself not be profitable, I suspect your consulting services have benefited immeasurably by your being an author.

Personally, I haven't purchased a technical manual since Wrox Press went under. I agree with Matt on MSDN. Microsoft's core documentation is really excellent, so you really only need the books covering obscure subjects.

# re: Tim O'Reilly on the State of the Computer Book Market 4/20/2004 11:57 AM Ian

I went for a long time without buying a book because I felt there was more free content on the web than I could ever read in many lifetimes. I've recently picked back up the book buying/reading habit because it can be more efficient. Some things are a snap to search and find on usenet, but many things are difficult.

Another problem with web content is that is often lacks depth. When I was learning winforms databinding I found tons of examples binding a grid to a dataset. What about the other 98% of the subject?

ian

# re: Tim O'Reilly on the State of the Computer Book Market 4/21/2004 1:26 PM Don

>>Personally, I haven't purchased a technical manual since Wrox Press went under.

I think that Apress http://www.apress.com/ purchased the rights to a bunch of the Wrox books, I know they published Wrox' Pro Apache book.

don

# re: Tim O'Reilly on the State of the Computer Book Market 4/29/2004 7:33 AM Jonathan Snook

I agree with the general sentiment here in that I haven't purchased a number of books because I feel I get the information for free on the Internet. I've often gone into a book store, perused the selection, looked at the $60-$100 price tag and think to myself, "I'll save my money."

# re: Tim O'Reilly on the State of the Computer Book Market 4/30/2004 8:31 PM Bruce Hopkins

I will hav eot concur with others, I hav enot purchased but maybe a couple of books since Wrox went under. Part of that is because I cna get a lot of what I need from the online documentation and second because there are not really any good books out there right now. At least on Asp.Net. I think I've bought all the ones that seem to be written on topics of interest. In my opinion the authors need to take thes etopics to a higher level and they will probably sell more books. I went to Barnes and Noble the other day and every book I picked up had the same info and very few complex examples. How many books do people need that show just the basics? I think all you need is one of those and then specialized books for the advanced stuff.

# Most IT books belong in a landfill 5/12/2004 5:45 PM David Moran

Programming books are way too expensive. Also it's well known among developers that most of them are just rehashed documentation that's available for nothing elsewhere. Also most books of this nature are way too long and lack a specific focus. Finally the pace at which development technologies are updated means that most working programmers have neither the time nor the motivation (given the depressed state of the IT job market) to upgrade their skills.

Most useful IT books I've purchased:

Programming Visual Basic 6.0 by Francesco Balena

Access 97 Developer's Handbook by Litwin/Getz/Gilbert

# New Book 5/30/2004 9:08 PM K. Scott Allen's Blog

# re: Tim O'Reilly on the State of the Computer Book Market 9/7/2004 4:57 AM James McGovern

Tim's posting covered sales volume and not profitability so is somewhat inaccurate. People are willing to pay lots of money for professional books but wouldn't pay the same for books on say, Microsoft Office.

Publishers can sell lots of copies of books on operating systems but aren't making much money by doing so.

# re: Tim O'Reilly on the State of the Computer Book Market 4/20/2005 1:35 PM J.G. Moore

The reason the computer book market is bad is for one simple reason. Publishers lack vision.

Make computers book FUN and COOL!

I wrote a Flash book about 4 years ago. My publishers wanted the book to be bigger than I wanted it to be. They also gave my book a crappy title to fit with the other "handbooks" titles.

Computer books need to be more "usa today" - like. More color images and less text. Even the "visual" - computer books that are out are just too general.

I don't mind paying $60 -$100 for a book... IF it has something I need. I would rather buy a book than mouse around the WWW wasting time.
I don't need to have a 400+ page book to feel like I've got my "monies" worth. Less is more.

If computer books had more color visuals and more "real" information the computer book market would be $tronger.

Publishers also need to incorporate training via video (via the CD-ROM or DVD) with books. Hello Camtasia??? Captivate??? Flash Video???

Why are we JUST reading? All of the computer stuff is VISUAL. We can learn just as much (possibly more) watching. DUH!!!

Just be innovative.

Title:  
Name:  
Url:
Protected by Clearscreen.SharpHIPEnter the code you see:
Comments   

My Links

Ads Via DevMavens

Archives

Post Categories

 

I am a Microsoft MVP for ASP.NET.
I am an ASPInsider.
<March 2010>
SMTWTFS
28123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031123
45678910

Comment Stats

DayTotal% of Total
Sunday 2056.8%
Monday 42514.1%
Tuesday 51917.2%
Wednesday 55618.4%
Thursday 58019.2%
Friday 54718.1%
Saturday 1886.2%
Total 3020100.0%

Hour1Total% of Total
12:00 AM 782.6%
1:00 AM 812.7%
2:00 AM 682.3%
3:00 AM 822.7%
4:00 AM 692.3%
5:00 AM 1264.2%
6:00 AM 1193.9%
7:00 AM 1816.0%
8:00 AM 1926.4%
9:00 AM 1585.2%
10:00 AM 1886.2%
11:00 AM 1936.4%
12:00 PM 2016.7%
1:00 PM 1846.1%
2:00 PM 1695.6%
3:00 PM 1354.5%
4:00 PM 1153.8%
5:00 PM 1073.5%
6:00 PM 1013.3%
7:00 PM 1073.5%
8:00 PM 923.0%
9:00 PM 882.9%
10:00 PM 913.0%
11:00 PM 953.1%
Total 3020100.0%

Comments by Blog Entry Date/Time

Day Entry MadeAvg.Total
Sunday 5.00160
Monday 4.80384
Tuesday 4.04477
Wednesday 7.39680
Thursday 6.26676
Friday 5.07466
Saturday 4.78177
Total 5.403020

Hour1 Entry MadeAvg.Total
12:00 AM 5.2937
1:00 AM 1.002
5:00 AM 0.000
7:00 AM 3.8550
8:00 AM 3.72134
9:00 AM 6.06297
10:00 AM 5.63276
11:00 AM 4.22194
12:00 PM 6.16351
1:00 PM 3.09133
2:00 PM 4.89230
3:00 PM 7.67322
4:00 PM 4.00108
5:00 PM 6.07170
6:00 PM 4.64116
7:00 PM 8.95188
8:00 PM 8.63164
9:00 PM 5.00115
10:00 PM 6.31101
11:00 PM 4.5732
Total 5.403020

Learn More About Comment Stats
1 - All times GMT -8...


Blog Stats

Favorite Web Sites

My Books

My MSDN Articles